Wednesday, August 12, 2015

Why are bisexual and gay people more caring? Why do straight people want to have kids while gay people don't?

Due to my temp job at a mall, I have made the prolonged observation that bi and gay people seem to have more of an added acuity in being more connected, sensitive, aware and empathizing towards other people, which makes them polite/respectful and caring individuals compared to straight people. This is confirmed all the time, even for some irritating gay people who hit on me.

Bi and gay people have both the masculine/aggression and feminine/passiveness qualities in them, It seems as though such both qualities cooperated together within a person would combine to form a wholesome kind of greater awareness.

In comparison, straight people seem to be a little adequate. They seem to be missing something, which makes them seem a little "lost" and disconnected to reality and other people.

Bi and gay people remind me of Counselor Troi In Star Trek who is an empath, they are empathetic like her and behave just like her. It is as though bi and gay people are being close to becoming empaths who can read minds. Perhaps they are close on their spiritual evolution in reaching such a psychic state.

Bi and gay people make very close and strong eye contact as if they have very strong focusing power in their consciousness. On the other hand, straight people lack the mental power in establishing such a connection. Perhaps the souls in straight people are not yet ready to take on such a state of being(bi and gay) that requires a stronger operating consciousness.

The heightened masculine/domination quality enables a person to expand the consciousness to reach far out to interpret reality beyond the scope of the self, while the feminine/passive quality enables one to feel and interpret the various aspects in reality. Because straight people are not heightened in both qualities, their consciousness is limited to just interpreting and feeling mostly their own needs.

Having children enables straight people the opportunity to CARE MORE for other people, and also to give them the opportunity to expand their sensitivity, connectivity, empathy etc that can help them to become more caring and respectful individuals.

The reason why straight people need to have children is because their souls need more experience in experiencing the masculine/domination and feminine/passive qualities from their children.

Many rigid and serious adults change and behave like kiddish retards when they look at small cute kids and babies, they temporarily become more passive. This just shows that they need kids to help them become more passive and connected to other people. For bi and gay people, they don't change when they interact with babies and kids, they remain in their friendly and caring self when they behave around kids.

The reason gay people don't need to have kids is because they don't need more assistance in experiencing more feminine/passive or masculine/dominating qualities.

Many straight dominating dads are more feminine/passive due to having children, many passive moms have become more masculine/dominating due to having children as well. Cooperating the feminine and masculine within parents would no doubt enable them to become more empathetic towards others, especially when parents discovers that their children are bi or gay and have to accept their kids as being normal.

So it is obvious to me that straight people have children because they still need much experience with the masculine/domination and feminine/passive.

So when some straight people think less of bi and gay people, I feel that those straight people are the ones who are actually "less". It's like how stupid people think that other people(including intelligent ones) are more stupid than they are, when it is actually the stupid people who are the only ones who are really stupid.

A 'stupid' thermometer that measures only up to 100 degrees can measure only up to 100 degrees, that's only how high(low) it can measure.

Tuesday, August 11, 2015

Spiritual commentary about bisexual and gay people

I mentioned before that the soul wants to cooperate the masculine/aggressiveness together with the feminine/passiveness/submissiveness personality. It wants to achieve this cooperation because a cooperated masculine and feminine personality can achieve a great level of peace compared to being extremely aggressive or passive.

So the soul wants to achieve great peace by being with a passive woman if it is an aggressive male.

A straight male would find a passive/submissive woman to be attractive because the woman is able to help him neutralize his aggressiveness, so that when he and the woman are together, he can achieve a higher level of peace and flow/beauty by cooperating his aggressiveness with her passiveness.

This is why a straight male would never find another man attractive. Nor would a straight male find a gay man attractive. Because another straight man and the gay man are not passive enough to neutralize his aggressiveness.

When the soul moves on from a straight orientation where it relies on being extreme aggressive or passive, to a more balanced orientation such as bisexual or gay, the soul takes on a more cooperated state of the aggressiveness and passiveness. The soul would then be able to perceive from a more flowing and objective/unbiased state of being.

This is why straight men are felt(by me) to have a dominating/aggressive flow, and why bisexuals and gays have a more graceful and peaceful wider open-minded perspective and behaviour.

In a way, to perceive from an angle, straight men are kind of "ugly(imbalanced, unsmooth)" in their flow, and bi and gay men are more beautiful(smooth) in their flow.

Many straight people do not understand why bi and gay people behave the way that they do, and therefore they perceive them as being strange. They do not yet have the wisdom and insight to understand why there are bi and gay people.

A straight man would feel more compatible with other straight men, compared to bi and gay men. This is due to the different level of flow/beauty between them.

A straight man would be perceived by bi and gay men to be quite blocky and one-sided in his perspective as though he is behaving like an aggressive soldier robot who likes things rough. Simply put, bi and gay men would perceive the straight guy to be "ugly" and "uncultured". 

A straight woman can be perceived by bi and gay men to be like a burning fire that can get out of control, burning anything with wild emotional assumptions. This is also can be perceived to be ugly and uncultured.

The straight man's ugly blockyness can cooperate with the straight woman's ugly wild emotions to become flexible and flowing.

The straight people perceive bi and gay people to be weird in their level of beauty, while the bi and gay people perceive straight people as being not as evolved as they are. This difference is the reason why there is much conflict and misunderstanding between the two groups.

Many straight guys worried that bi and gay men would hit on them, but their fears are exaggerated. Because bi and gay men actually find straight men to be quite ugly and repulsive. It's only the movies that create such a false worry by showing gays to be hitting on straight men all the time.

If one would examine a bi or gay man carefully, one would observe that the bi/gay man has qualities of both a male and a female, he would have the aggressiveness cooperated with the passiveness. However, many gay men are still loop-sided and tend to behave in a very passive manner. Other "straight-looking" bi and gay men have such qualities in a more cooperated/balanced way.

There are straight men because the straight man desires to cooperate his aggressiveness with the woman's passiveness. They do not desire to be sexually interested in bi and gay men because they have the greater more primary/crucial need to cooperate his aggressiveness with lots of "100% pure passiveness" that can come from a straight woman.

There are bi people because they desire to cooperate their aggressiveness with passiveness, but they have reached a level where they begin to desire cooperating with a gay male to use him as a guide on how to balance the aggressiveness and passiveness within the self. This is why bi men desire to be with women as well as with men.

There are gay people because they want to use other males as a guide on how to balance the aggressiveness and passiveness within the self. This is why gay men desire to be with other gay men because they want to be with like-minded people who are also working to cooperate the aggressiveness and passiveness within the self.

The sexuality of the soul is not just about having sex, but it is about the work of the soul to cooperate the aggressiveness with the passiveness in order to achieve a higher level of peaceful and objective consciousness.

Sexuality in this way, has a lot to do with spirituality.

For one to move forward in this spiritual journey, one has to explore one's current sexuality and to fulfill the journey.

If one would to observe a bi or gay man who is successful in cooperated the aggressiveness and passiveness within the self, one can see that he is really peaceful and happy with himself and others. This could be why gay people are described to be gay/happy.

Many religious texts were altered by the then-ruling government because many people in ancient times could not understand this level of spirituality related to bisexuals and gays. The ruling priests therefore wrote in the religious texts to inhibit this form of behaviour because they did not understand about bi and gay sexuality and they could not resolve the strangeness that they perceived about it. They assumed that it could only lead to bad(restriction) and did not realize that it can lead to good(liberation).

Many straight people still do not understand when they see a gay man struggling to cooperate his aggressiveness with his passiveness, all they can see is a strange form of "sissyness", but yet they do not judge a "sissy woman" in the same level of judgment.

It all comes down to what straight people assume to be normal and what they want the perfect world to be. This desire for their own kind of straight perfection would only create lots of non-acceptance(non-love, hatred, intolerance) for the things that they find to be strange and out of place in their ideal perfect world.

Friday, May 8, 2015

Shop at and save from massive online discounts! Highly recommended!

Get to save $10 at for your first order above $40, and you also get to give me money!

If you shop at for the first time and use my referral code, you get a $10 discount for orders above $40 and I will earn $10, and I also earn a subsequent 6% from your subsequent orders for the next 12 months, and 2% for thereafter.

I have already spent over $300 at and they offer very high discounts for products that are hard to find. I highly recommend the site to anyone.

This is my referral link --
My coupon code is: ZLL348

If you start to shop there, you can also do the same and earn money by referring others to the site with your own referral link.

Here are the items I have bought:

Muscle-building supplements--

Vegan food ingredients--

Vitamins and nutrients--

For the face--

Saturday, May 2, 2015

The Real Reason Why Vision was Able to Lift Thor's Hammer Mjolnir

To clear up some things first, Captain America said at the ending in the Age of Ultron movie that Vision could lift the hammer because he is a machine, but the Captain was not accurate. The elevator can lift the hammer from the bottom, it cannot hold the hammer at the handle and separate it from the ground. It was shown in the first Thor movie that the hammer cannot be separated from the desert ground by machines.

Vision is also not totally a machine but has living human cells and a brain.

In the first Thor movie, Thor was not able to lift the hammer after he was banished to Earth because Odin felt that Thor was not worthy to use the hammer because Thor previously misused the hammer not to preserve lives but to misuse it to harm and kill people unnecessarily.

The worthiness to hold the hammer is to preserve life and does not come from other intentions.

Thor was able to get back his power and hold the hammer because he finally gains the intention to preserve the life of the people in the small town as seen in the following video.


To use the hammer with the intention to remove Evil and preserve Good is also deemed as unworthy because seeing Evil as separated from Good is too small-minded, and cannot do the job of preserving life.

The other avengers could not lift the hammer because they all have the intention to use the hammer to rid Evil and preserve Good, which is far from the hammer's purpose to preserve life.

Vision was also heard saying that he is on the side of life, to protect it. He has the intention to preserve life without being distracted by the notions of judging things to be simply Good or Evil. This is why Vision was deemed worthy to use the hammer.

The other avengers could not hold the hammer because they perceive the small picture rather than the bigger picture to preserve and protect life:

1) Black Widow is an assassin whose main job is to kill,
2) Tony is materialistic and thoughtless and does not care much about preserving other life but his friends and his own. He has a history of selling weapons to clients that got civilians killed by his weapons.
3) Captain America is a soldier who's job is to kill.
4) Warhammer is a soldier who kills
5) Hawkeye is also a soldier who kills

Even though Captain America can move the hammer a little because he is leader of the Avengers and can see the bigger picture compared to the other members(besides Thor), the Captain still cannot see the bigger picture in the same level like Thor and Vision.

Therefore, the only blindingly obvious reason how a person is deemed to be worthy enough to lift the hammer is if he/she would use it properly with the bigger intention to preserve life.

The hammer is only meant to preserve and protect life, it would not be usable for those who want to use it without holding this purpose in mind.

Sunday, April 5, 2015

Did Anne Hathaway quit her vegan diet due to iodine deficiency?

I think yes, so could be the case for many vegans and vegetarians.

I have realized in the past couple of days, people who were vegan but chose to go back to eating meat due to feeling tired/lethargic when they do heavy physical activity(such Anne Hathaway), many of them were probably suffering from iodine deficiency. 

Iodine deficiency leads to a lower thyroid function, which leads to a low metabolic rate that can cause weight gain and fatigue. This could be why many people find it hard to lose weight even on a vegan diet.

When Anne Hathaway went back to eating fish from her vegan diet, she said she immediately felt more energy. Fish contains lots of iodine that could have resolved her supposed iodine deficiency. Even though fish contains creatine that could also contribute to higher energy levels, the iodine would have a greater impact in increasing energy levels especially if the person is suffering from iodine deficiency.

I have heard of many people who started on the vegan diet and then complained of feeling tired, especially for vegans who do lots of fitness. Many of them probably suffered from iodine deficiency and needed to take iodine. Vegan sources of iodine include iodized salt, seaweed, kelp and bottled supplements.

The next time you hear of someone complaining they feel tired after starting a vegan diet, do them a favour and suggest that they take iodine supplements quickly. 

(Fat is also important to maintain hormonal balance to feel energetic. I heard from a vegan on the 80/10/10 diet who started taking fat said that she felt much more healthier. Sodium functions as an electrolyte and is also important to maintain energy levels. Taking creatine supplements can  also increase the energy transport within the body.)

Iodine – The mineral that charges your energy battery